(Please accept my apologies for this long-ago-promised and painfully overdue comparison. -DK)
With the demise of the Chrysler 300 SRT, Americans are limited to two choices for a domestic sports sedan. And neither of them are built in America.
The Chevrolet SS, as we all know, is built in Port Elizabeth, Australia. Based on the Holden VE Commodore, the SS gets the best of what Holden has to offer: a rear-drive Zeta platform, an LS3 V8 engine and styling that many find to be far too restrained and understated – to me, that's a big part of the appeal.
When Bark M drove this car a year ago (to help kick off our Reader Ride Review program), he was diplomatically lukewarm about the car, praising the small-block V8 and the 7/10ths handling prowess, while criticizing the car's balky gearbox and Bridgestone Potenza RE050 tires. I was dumbstruck. As a big fan of the Pontiac G8 (and Australian rear-drive sedans), I wanted to believe that Bark's impressions of the SS were colored by the fact that he drives a Boss 302 on a daily basis. It turns out he was right.
While GM nominally describes the SS as a limited production sports sedan, it's easy to understand why sales of this car are in the toilet, marketing support or no marketing support. The G8 was a brilliant last stand from a dying brand when it was introduced in 2009. Driving the SS today just shows how the competition has moved on.
Yes, the interior with the big MyLink touch screen and the heads-up display is a vast improvement over the old G8. There's lots of space for passengers both fore and aft. Flimsy paddles aside, everything is high quality, pleasing to the touch and sufficiently upscale – if you can ignore the bright red "SS" emblems stitched into the seats. The trunk is made for an Australian family, which is to say, it's huge.
I wanted to like this car so, so badly, but the driving experience fell utterly flat. Yes, you get big thrust and a nice small-block soundtrack from the LS3 (finally a proper LS, unlike the 6.0 mill in the old G8). A naturally aspirated V8 is fast becoming an endangered species, and this is one of the best. But the transmission can't keep pace.
Nor could the rest of the car, for that matter. On the winding backroads around Summit Point Raceway, the SS just didn't feel that special. At a hair under 4000 lbs, it's lighter than the Charger SRT, but you'd never know it. The SS isn't as buttoned-down in turns as the Charger, while the uncommunicative steering doesn't flatter the car's size or heft. In the brilliant shade of metallic black, the SS seemed to be the closest thing available to an old moonshiner's hot-rod. It also drove like one too.
If you want the top-performing American sports sedan, you'll have to opt for the Charger SRT 392, which is actually built in Brampton, Ontario, Canada. It's not as elegant as the SS, though I bet that many people will prefer its more aggressive looks. The new for 2015 restyling tones down some of the overly-aggro snout on the outgoing car, but there's no mistaking it for the V6 SXT you'll find on the Avis lot.
At nearly 4400 lbs and just under 200 inches long, the Charger is, as they'd say in the Antipodes, "a big fucker". The lighter SS makes do with less power – 6.2L and 415 horsepower versus the Charger's 6.4L and 485 horsepower -, but the seemingly minor differences are deceptive on paper. Sort of like how there is but a mere millimeter difference between a 9mm and a 10mm handgun cartridge, but one is used by police forces while the other can stop a grizzly dead in its tracks.
The SRT V8 is not as refined or as smooth as the storied LS3, but the extra output, combined with the utterly brilliant 8-speed automatic means that the Charger 392 has the Chevrolet beat hands down for aural drama and straight line performance. The soundtrack is a masterpiece of pyrotechnic sounds that mimics the AMG 6.2L V8s NASCAR-esque notes, and the engine is as strong between 60 and 100 mph as it is from a dig. If that weren't enough, the 2015 SRT adds the Hellcat's massive Brembo brakes (15.4 inch rotors up front, 13.8 inches in the back) and a whole suite of adjustable driving modes for the suspension, throttle, gearbox and traction control. There's also an updated interior with better materials and the excellent UConnect/Alpine stereo system – I concur with Baruth when he says it might be the best mainstream audio system in the business.
With the SS getting a 6-speed manual and an updated suspension for 2015, a rematch is only fair. But driving the two cars back to back opened my eyes to the possibility that, aside from CAFE and a shrinking market for full-size cars, there's a reason we've never gotten the Commodore as a mainstream Chevrolet product: it's just not good enough to compete. Right now, FCA has the full-size rear-drive mainstream sedan segment all to itself, and its sales are still strong, even after all these years. For an Americanized-Commodore to steal sales away from the LX cars – and the Taurus, and Avalon and Azera and the Impala- it would have to be extraordinarily compelling. Right now, I can't say that about the SS, no matter how much I like the idea of it.
The post Capsule Comparison: 2015 Dodge Charger SRT 392 Vs. 2014 Chevrolet SS appeared first on The Truth About Cars.
from The Truth About Cars http://ift.tt/Jh8LjA
Put the internet to work for you.
No comments:
Post a Comment