Did Government Meddling Cripple The Dodge Dart?

As we come to yet another hiccup in the launch of the Dodge Dart, it's worth taking a look backwards to examine how we got to this point; the elimination of a second shift at the Dundee, Michigan plant that builds the Dart's 1.4L FIRE engine, as well as the firing or re-assignment of 58 workers.   Both Ronnie and Michael Karesh both noted, the same  1.4T FIRE engine that's so delightful in the Fiat 5o0 Abarth is weaksauce in the Dart, and the clunky dual-clutch auto doesn't help matters either. If it weren't for government mandated fuel economy targets imposed as a condition of the bailout, that engine – and possibly the Dart – wouldn't even be here right now. Just over a year ago, UAW members at the plant had just authorized a strike at the Dundee plant over a change in shift schedules – despite an apparent agreement not to strike, as another condition of the bailout. The FIRE engine, widely panned in the Dart, seems to exist solely to satisfy the requirement that Fiat build a 40 MPG car in America – a requirement that TTAC summarily exposed as bogus, since the agreement stated that the car must get 40 MPG "unadjusted", or roughly 30 MPG combined in the "real world" fuel economy figures that everyone is familiar with. But without the 40 MPG Dart, the diminutive FIRE engine and U.S. production of it, Fiat would not have received their 20 percent stake in Chrysler, along with the option to increase their share in 5 percent increments once these milestones (the third being Fiat recording $1.5 billion in revenue outside the NAFTA Zone). Ronnie hit the nail on the head with his summation that the Dart, as Chrysler's first product overseen by Marchionne, was at best the victim of a botched launch, and at worst a failure made of cobbled together Chrysler and Fiat parts. But the 1.4T seems to have been a victim of to put it crudely, the current administration instructing car companies to build vehicles consumers don't want – a charge often leveled at the Chevrolet Volt by its more vocal critics. The irony is that only one model, the 1.4T equipped Dart Aero, actually gets 40 MPG or above. Since the government agreement specified that the 40 MPG car be "produced in commercial quantities"  without any concrete definition, it's impossible to know how many 40 MPG Darts actually made their way into the hands of consumers. Interestingly enough, the Dart Aero is broken out as a separate model on the EPA's fuel economy website. As a replacement for the FIRE and its capacity at the plant, Chrysler will use Dundee to build more of the 2.4L Tigershark 4-cylinder engines that will apparently be a much better fit for North American drivers, rather than the small turbo engine that's more at home in A and B segment Fiat products. But if it weren't for politicians deciding that they knew better, and that filling some nebulous "green car" mandate was a holy task, this whole mess could have been avoided, and the financial future of Chrysler perhaps that much more secure.       from The Truth About Cars http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com

Put the internet to work for you. via Personal Recipe 680102