In our first installment, we focused on Daimler, Mazda, and the Volkswagen Group. Today, we'll focus on BMW/Mini, Subaru, and Hyundai/Kia. But first, let me address a couple of the comments about the cars the B&B said I got wrong:
- I stand by my comments about the Golf. One commenter said the Golf was just the "GTI with less power, and less handling ability." Well, duh. That's like saying the Focus and Fiesta are the same cars as the FoST and the FiST, but with less power, and less handling ability. The power and the handling ability are what make the GTI special. Granted, the VW dealer network is wretched, so one can excuse the poor sales numbers of the Golf overall, but the Golf is actually outsold by the GTI. I can't think of another example of a higher-cost, performance variant of a car outselling the base model—even the base Impreza, which I virtually never notice out in the wild, outsells the WRX and STI 2:1.
- I don't think the C-Class is a bad car at all—I just think it's fighting an uphill battle against the 3-Series. That being said, I definitely need to get some seat time in the new C-Class, as Mercedes has yet to deliver a press vehicle to my front door. Any readers who have one and would like to have it reviewed, let us know and I'll get to you.
That being said, I continue to welcome your comments and dissenting opinions. Now, let's move on.
BMW/MINI
The Good:
Let me be clear: I'm not one of those who thinks that BMW has "lost it's way." You know who likes the "good old days?" Two kinds of people: People who forget what life was like before the Internet and young punks who want to seem ironically cool while they lament the loss of the E30 that they've never even seen, much less driven, on their Twitter feeds.
Newsflash to any twentysomethings pining for the days when BMW apparently had a roadmap out of Munich: the old days kinda sucked. Zero to sixty to less than eight seconds was considered "fast." A "hot hatch" made 110 horsepower. Crash test ratings were horrific. Anything that was faster than a 2015 Subaru BRZ was so damned expensive that 90 percent of Americans couldn't have afforded it. Trust me—you're better off living through your windshield than your rear-view mirrors when it comes to cars.
As such, the M235i is proof that the boys in Bavaria still know exactly what they're doing (although most readers here know me as a Ford fanboy, in the interest of full disclosure, let it be known that I once put down a $5K deposit on a 2008 135i, but that's a story for another time). You think you want an E30 M3? No, you don't. You want an M235i. It's the spiritual successor to that legendary 192 horsepower machine, but in addition to being well-balanced, it can also break the five second barrier in the sixty miles per hour dash.
Speaking of the M3, the new M3/M4 combo is skull-crushingly fast. Yes, it's bigger and heavier than the E30 and E36 were. So? The new M3 is just flat-out better than any of its predecessors. Yes, it's probably gotten too expensive—but we'll talk more about that in a second.
I had the purely effervescent joy of driving the M6 Gran Coupe around Nelson Ledges before it's official launch to the public. I drove my Boss 302 to the track that day from Kentucky, and before I got into the big Bimmer, I took a few laps around the circuit in the Mustang. Now, keep in mind—the Boss 302 is provably faster around most tracks in America than the E92 M3 was. The Boss was hitting the kink at about 128 MPH, which was downright ass-puckering. The M6 Gran Coupe—the big, fat, unwieldy M6—hit it at…wait for it…141. Even more impressive was the relative ease with which it did so—there was absolutely none of the drama that was associated with the 302. While some people might appreciate a bit of drama on a racetrack, I gotta tell you that when you're driving somebody else's $145K car, you appreciate a lack of it.
Meanwhile, you can complain about the turbo 4-bangers all you want (you can still get an inline six, you know). You can complain about the proliferation of models all you want (they still make a 335i sedan). I'm still gonna put the 3-Series in the "Good" category, if only because it's still the standard bearer for the segment. You don't like it? What would you rather have? An A4? A C-Class (based on yesterday, maybe)? An IS? A G? Nah. The 3-Series is still the king.
The Not-As-Good:
It's hard to not appreciate the MINI Cooper Hardtop for what it is. I know that they have wretched reliability. But, damnit, I still find myself trolling Craigslist for well-loved early examples. In many ways, the proliferation of hot hatches available in the USA today has made the MINI Hardtop somewhat irrelevant—is there anybody who'd take a MINI over a GTI/FoST?—which is why I had to drop it down to Not-As-Good. But it's a fine line.
Now, if you want to complain about the turbo 4 in the 5-Series? All right, I'll listen to you. In fact, I agree with you. I can't get behind a $50k+ car that rocks a four-cylinder. The Fiver has never felt like it was the right car for the segment, and this F10 generation is just…meh.
The Ugly:
Every MINI that isn't the Hardtop. Seriously. Just stop all that nonsense.
The 7-Series has always felt like the big brother who has the little brother who's the star athlete—it's the Cooper of the Manning Family. There's nothing wrong with the Siebener, per se—it's just not the icon of the brand. The S-Class owns this segment, and it often feels like BMW has given up on competing.
Once there was a car that was so ugly, everybody died. I'm talking about those god-awful GT models. I just don't get it. Maybe there's a market segment that this car is filling, but I don't know what it is.
Here's the biggest ugly thing about the BMW brand in 2015—the sticker prices. I visit BMW dealers weekly, and I see prices on the window stickers that are just downright mindboggling. With reported lease numbers approaching seventy percent, the astronomical prices barely matter. As such, it's not uncommon to see as many as three different prices on one car—just last week in Indiana, I saw a 328i in the showroom that had $43k on the sticker, $40k on the stand next to the car, and $37k on a tag hanging from the rearview mirror. Oh, and then it said $359 a month on the windshield. There's a real push-and-pull between the desire to maintain an upscale brand, yet keep moving 100K 3/4 series a years.
Whew. Okay, let's move on. Damn, I forgot the X5. Throw it up there in the "Good" for me, would ya? Thanks.
SUBARU
The Good:
The WRX/STI combo has made Subaru relevant to enthusiasts for over a decade, now. I remember driving my 2000 Hyundai Tiburon to a Subaru dealership in 2001, begging them to give me a decent trade value toward one of the original, bug-eyed WRXes. Even if they could have made the numbers work, there's no way that I could have afforded the insurance. But everybody my age (I was 23) desperately wanted one. Almost fifteen years later, the WRX (and now, STI) are still limited to about 300 HP, so they're no longer "fast" by today's standards (which is kinda mind-boggling, if you think about it), but they've reinvented themselves as affordable alternatives to the pony car. As the Evo walks the plank, the WRX/STI keeps the Japanese rally car dream alive for kids playing Gran Turismo everywhere.
The Outback and Forester continue to sell in surprising numbers—in fact, if you combined the two of them (and who among the non-Subaru faithful can honestly tell the difference, anyway), they'd be the 8th best selling vehicle in America. You can't help but love them when you drive them—there's really nothing else like them. If you want an Outback or a Forester, you probably aren't really shopping anything else.
The Not-As-Good:
The Legacy. You know, if Subaru could just build a competitive mid-sized sedan, they'd have a shot at some real market share. Unfortunately, they can't. It's not that there's anything particularly wrong about the Legacy—there's just nothing particularly right about it. The best they can hope to do is compete with the bottom tier of mid-sizers, like the 200 and the Malibu.
The Ugly:
The Emperor's New Clothes are completely off at this point. The BRZ is selling in numbers that the Lincoln MKS scoffs at. Unfortunately, the BRZ/FR-S combo really are the spiritual successor to the RX-8—underpowered, overhyped, and dead in the water in four years. It's hard to imagine anybody picking this car over any of its competitors. If you're still waving the flag for this car, you're simply delusional.
HYUNDAI/KIA
The Good:
The Hyundai Genesis sedan is remarkable. If you shop the V-6 against the similarly priced competition (Buick Lacrosse, Lincoln MKS, Ford Taurus, Chevy Impala), there's really no case to be made for anything else. The real competition is the Chrysler 300C—and I would pick the Genesis every time. You can tell I really love a car when I make it the star of a Sunday Story.
The Kia Soul is one of my favorite cars, anywhere, period. I'd gladly roll down Hamsterdam Avenue in a Yellow Soul +. It obviously doesn't have any sporting intent whatsoever, but who cares? The Soul picked up the ball right where the first-generation Scion xB dropped it, and they've been running with it ever since.
The Not-As-Good:
As far as looks go in the midsize category, the Kia Optima is the most attractive option. Unfortunately, at some point, you have to stop admiring it from the outside and actually get in and drive—and that's where the Optima falls down a bit. The four-cylinder Optima is painfully slow in comparison to the similarly engined Accord or Mazda6. Braking from higher speeds is a bit of an adventure, too. However, the Optima is probably the smoothest riding of any of the midsizers on the market, and tech-savvy people who don't care much for driving will like it. I can't quite convince myself to call it "Good," but neither is it "Bad."
The 2015 Elantra GT is a decent car, and it's much better than the 2001 Elantra sedan that Mrs. Bark once owned. I drove it from Grand Rapids, Michigan to Chicago last week, and I was neither inspired to hate it or love it. Which means that it probably belongs right here.
The Ugly:
Oh, Hyundai…what have you done with the Sonata? Four years ago, I used to search for the previous-gen Sonata on rental car row—now I avoid the new one like a crazy ex-girlfriend. It's pokey. It's ugly. It doesn't turn. It costs too much. I hate it.
That's it for today. I fully intended to get to Honda and Nissan, but here we are at 2000 words. Oh, well. We'll get to them, and maybe Toyota, too, in our next installment.
The post Bark's Bites: The Good, The Not-As-Good, and The Ugly: Part Two appeared first on The Truth About Cars.
from The Truth About Cars http://ift.tt/Jh8LjA
Put the internet to work for you.
No comments:
Post a Comment