From the new year onwards, all passengers in a car whether sitting in the front or back have to buckle up or face a RM300 fine. This only applies if the passenger is over 17 years old, but if you are younger, the driver of the car is the one who will be punished as according to Road Transport Director-General Datuk Solah Mat Hassan, it is the responsibility of the driver to ensure the safety of the minors that they are driving.
This new seatbelt ruling includes the rear seatbelts, but excludes the following:
* Cars registered before 1st of January 1995
* Cars registered after the 1st of January 1995 but not equipped with rear seatbelt anchorage points
* Commercial vehicles such as taxis and rental cars
* Vehicles with more than 9 seats including the driver’s
* Transport vehicles with capacity above 3.5 tonnes
Wait, that’s not all. The RM300 fine will be in effect only within a “grace period” of between the 1st of January 2009 to the end of June 2009. From the 1st of July 2009 onwards, this fine will be upped to RM2,000 and you could even go to jail for up to 1 year. Yes, it may seem harsh… but if you buckle up, you won’t have to worry. It’s for your own safety anyway.
Showing posts with label Local News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Local News. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Seatbelt fine of RM300 from 1st January 2009
From the new year onwards, all passengers in a car whether sitting in the front or back have to buckle up or face a RM300 fine. This only applies if the passenger is over 17 years old, but if you are younger, the driver of the car is the one who will be punished as according to Road Transport Director-General Datuk Solah Mat Hassan, it is the responsibility of the driver to ensure the safety of the minors that they are driving.
This new seatbelt ruling includes the rear seatbelts, but excludes the following:
* Cars registered before 1st of January 1995
* Cars registered after the 1st of January 1995 but not equipped with rear seatbelt anchorage points
* Commercial vehicles such as taxis and rental cars
* Vehicles with more than 9 seats including the driver’s
* Transport vehicles with capacity above 3.5 tonnes
Wait, that’s not all. The RM300 fine will be in effect only within a “grace period” of between the 1st of January 2009 to the end of June 2009. From the 1st of July 2009 onwards, this fine will be upped to RM2,000 and you could even go to jail for up to 1 year. Yes, it may seem harsh… but if you buckle up, you won’t have to worry. It’s for your own safety anyway.
This new seatbelt ruling includes the rear seatbelts, but excludes the following:
* Cars registered before 1st of January 1995
* Cars registered after the 1st of January 1995 but not equipped with rear seatbelt anchorage points
* Commercial vehicles such as taxis and rental cars
* Vehicles with more than 9 seats including the driver’s
* Transport vehicles with capacity above 3.5 tonnes
Wait, that’s not all. The RM300 fine will be in effect only within a “grace period” of between the 1st of January 2009 to the end of June 2009. From the 1st of July 2009 onwards, this fine will be upped to RM2,000 and you could even go to jail for up to 1 year. Yes, it may seem harsh… but if you buckle up, you won’t have to worry. It’s for your own safety anyway.
Saturday, December 13, 2008
Proton Campro turbo engine by 2010-2011
Proton managing director Datuk Syed Zainal Abidin told the Oman Economic Review that Proton was developing a turbocharged engine set for introduction by the years 2010 to 2011, just in time for a facelift of the 2009 Proton MPV which could see the introduction of this turbocharged engine.
The turbocharged engine would be in line with the current market trends of having a small displacement engine but forced inducted to produce the equivalent horsepower of a larger motor, usually with more torque, and more fuel efficiency. The engine will have the power output equivalent to a 2.0 liter engine. We could be looking at a 1.6 liter Campro turbo or Campro CPS turbo engine producing about 150 horsepower and perhaps 240Nm of torque.
Proton is also set to spend RM5 billion over the next 5 years on R&D efforts, which is about RM1 billion a year. Other efforts (as quoted in the report) include developing a small competitive car, acquiring diesel engines licensed from an international OEM (Fiat? Peugeot?) because of their popularity in markets such as India, hybrid and electric technologies, the possibility of a joint model with Lotus (spiritual successor to the Lotus Carlton based on a Proton maybe?), and the reduction of weight of Proton models.
The turbocharged engine would be in line with the current market trends of having a small displacement engine but forced inducted to produce the equivalent horsepower of a larger motor, usually with more torque, and more fuel efficiency. The engine will have the power output equivalent to a 2.0 liter engine. We could be looking at a 1.6 liter Campro turbo or Campro CPS turbo engine producing about 150 horsepower and perhaps 240Nm of torque.
Proton is also set to spend RM5 billion over the next 5 years on R&D efforts, which is about RM1 billion a year. Other efforts (as quoted in the report) include developing a small competitive car, acquiring diesel engines licensed from an international OEM (Fiat? Peugeot?) because of their popularity in markets such as India, hybrid and electric technologies, the possibility of a joint model with Lotus (spiritual successor to the Lotus Carlton based on a Proton maybe?), and the reduction of weight of Proton models.
Proton Campro turbo engine by 2010-2011
Proton managing director Datuk Syed Zainal Abidin told the Oman Economic Review that Proton was developing a turbocharged engine set for introduction by the years 2010 to 2011, just in time for a facelift of the 2009 Proton MPV which could see the introduction of this turbocharged engine.
The turbocharged engine would be in line with the current market trends of having a small displacement engine but forced inducted to produce the equivalent horsepower of a larger motor, usually with more torque, and more fuel efficiency. The engine will have the power output equivalent to a 2.0 liter engine. We could be looking at a 1.6 liter Campro turbo or Campro CPS turbo engine producing about 150 horsepower and perhaps 240Nm of torque.
Proton is also set to spend RM5 billion over the next 5 years on R&D efforts, which is about RM1 billion a year. Other efforts (as quoted in the report) include developing a small competitive car, acquiring diesel engines licensed from an international OEM (Fiat? Peugeot?) because of their popularity in markets such as India, hybrid and electric technologies, the possibility of a joint model with Lotus (spiritual successor to the Lotus Carlton based on a Proton maybe?), and the reduction of weight of Proton models.
The turbocharged engine would be in line with the current market trends of having a small displacement engine but forced inducted to produce the equivalent horsepower of a larger motor, usually with more torque, and more fuel efficiency. The engine will have the power output equivalent to a 2.0 liter engine. We could be looking at a 1.6 liter Campro turbo or Campro CPS turbo engine producing about 150 horsepower and perhaps 240Nm of torque.
Proton is also set to spend RM5 billion over the next 5 years on R&D efforts, which is about RM1 billion a year. Other efforts (as quoted in the report) include developing a small competitive car, acquiring diesel engines licensed from an international OEM (Fiat? Peugeot?) because of their popularity in markets such as India, hybrid and electric technologies, the possibility of a joint model with Lotus (spiritual successor to the Lotus Carlton based on a Proton maybe?), and the reduction of weight of Proton models.
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Shahrir: Government now enjoying fuel tax revenue
What a turn of events! In just a few months we’ve gone through a record number of petrol price hikes and reductions, the hasty introduction of a lump sum-based subsidy cheque, and more. All because of fluctuating crude oil prices.
As of today, Malaysians have begun paying tax for their fuel again… in fact the government has not had to pay the promised RM0.30 per liter fuel subsidy since the beginning of November 2008 due to the dropping crude oil prices which leads to lower refinery prices.
According to Minister of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Datuk Shahrir Samad, the government also collected taxes for fuel from September 2001 to February 2002, but after that period crude oil had gone up so the government had stopped collecting taxes to prevent fuel prices from going up too much.
From the current price of RM2 per liter from RON97 petrol, roughly 12 sen goes to the petrol stations and roughly 19 sen goes to the oil companies. The balance is RM1.69, but Shahrir says this is actually higher than the refinery price.
While he did not say exactly how much refinery prices were at the moment (this will go up and down according to crude oil prices), he gave an example of RM1.30 per liter. This means the government can make as much as 39 sen per liter of fuel, and this amount will vary as the refinery prices go up and down along the month.
Because of the change of situation and the potential now for long-term income from the sale of fuel in this country, the government Economic Council will be meeting this month to decide on a new mechanism for petrol pricing in the country. Things that could be discussed are how often should price revisions be made, and what kind of tolerances towards crude oil prices should there be. I would imagine they could decide on something like a maximum tax when crude oil prices are low (or alternatively, a floor price for petrol), and a maximum subsidy when crude oil prices are high.
It’s sad to see the government so easily turn its back on its promise of a RM0.30 per liter subsidy, but Datuk Shahrir is of the opinion that the current low fuel prices are quite fair and there’s no need to go drop them too much even though the government won’t have to pay fuel subsidies per liter. He says this additional revenue will be used to strengthen the economy in face of the threat of the recession.
I’m pretty sure the Cabinet is happy with Shahrir’s performance as Minister of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs so far. He’s done his job well in helping tighten the government’s coffers, though many would argue it isn’t in the interest of “Consumer Affairs” at all.
All we can do is hope that the money saved and earned will be used in the right channels by those who have the nice job of choosing where to spend the money.
BTW, no one has revealed what the margins, subsidies and revenues are for diesel. Is there room to upgrade to something with a less sulphur so we can enjoy cars like the Ford Focus TDCi and a potential upcoming diesel Honda City?
As of today, Malaysians have begun paying tax for their fuel again… in fact the government has not had to pay the promised RM0.30 per liter fuel subsidy since the beginning of November 2008 due to the dropping crude oil prices which leads to lower refinery prices.
According to Minister of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Datuk Shahrir Samad, the government also collected taxes for fuel from September 2001 to February 2002, but after that period crude oil had gone up so the government had stopped collecting taxes to prevent fuel prices from going up too much.
From the current price of RM2 per liter from RON97 petrol, roughly 12 sen goes to the petrol stations and roughly 19 sen goes to the oil companies. The balance is RM1.69, but Shahrir says this is actually higher than the refinery price.
While he did not say exactly how much refinery prices were at the moment (this will go up and down according to crude oil prices), he gave an example of RM1.30 per liter. This means the government can make as much as 39 sen per liter of fuel, and this amount will vary as the refinery prices go up and down along the month.
Because of the change of situation and the potential now for long-term income from the sale of fuel in this country, the government Economic Council will be meeting this month to decide on a new mechanism for petrol pricing in the country. Things that could be discussed are how often should price revisions be made, and what kind of tolerances towards crude oil prices should there be. I would imagine they could decide on something like a maximum tax when crude oil prices are low (or alternatively, a floor price for petrol), and a maximum subsidy when crude oil prices are high.
It’s sad to see the government so easily turn its back on its promise of a RM0.30 per liter subsidy, but Datuk Shahrir is of the opinion that the current low fuel prices are quite fair and there’s no need to go drop them too much even though the government won’t have to pay fuel subsidies per liter. He says this additional revenue will be used to strengthen the economy in face of the threat of the recession.
I’m pretty sure the Cabinet is happy with Shahrir’s performance as Minister of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs so far. He’s done his job well in helping tighten the government’s coffers, though many would argue it isn’t in the interest of “Consumer Affairs” at all.
All we can do is hope that the money saved and earned will be used in the right channels by those who have the nice job of choosing where to spend the money.
BTW, no one has revealed what the margins, subsidies and revenues are for diesel. Is there room to upgrade to something with a less sulphur so we can enjoy cars like the Ford Focus TDCi and a potential upcoming diesel Honda City?
Shahrir: Government now enjoying fuel tax revenue
What a turn of events! In just a few months we’ve gone through a record number of petrol price hikes and reductions, the hasty introduction of a lump sum-based subsidy cheque, and more. All because of fluctuating crude oil prices.
As of today, Malaysians have begun paying tax for their fuel again… in fact the government has not had to pay the promised RM0.30 per liter fuel subsidy since the beginning of November 2008 due to the dropping crude oil prices which leads to lower refinery prices.
According to Minister of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Datuk Shahrir Samad, the government also collected taxes for fuel from September 2001 to February 2002, but after that period crude oil had gone up so the government had stopped collecting taxes to prevent fuel prices from going up too much.
From the current price of RM2 per liter from RON97 petrol, roughly 12 sen goes to the petrol stations and roughly 19 sen goes to the oil companies. The balance is RM1.69, but Shahrir says this is actually higher than the refinery price.
While he did not say exactly how much refinery prices were at the moment (this will go up and down according to crude oil prices), he gave an example of RM1.30 per liter. This means the government can make as much as 39 sen per liter of fuel, and this amount will vary as the refinery prices go up and down along the month.
Because of the change of situation and the potential now for long-term income from the sale of fuel in this country, the government Economic Council will be meeting this month to decide on a new mechanism for petrol pricing in the country. Things that could be discussed are how often should price revisions be made, and what kind of tolerances towards crude oil prices should there be. I would imagine they could decide on something like a maximum tax when crude oil prices are low (or alternatively, a floor price for petrol), and a maximum subsidy when crude oil prices are high.
It’s sad to see the government so easily turn its back on its promise of a RM0.30 per liter subsidy, but Datuk Shahrir is of the opinion that the current low fuel prices are quite fair and there’s no need to go drop them too much even though the government won’t have to pay fuel subsidies per liter. He says this additional revenue will be used to strengthen the economy in face of the threat of the recession.
I’m pretty sure the Cabinet is happy with Shahrir’s performance as Minister of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs so far. He’s done his job well in helping tighten the government’s coffers, though many would argue it isn’t in the interest of “Consumer Affairs” at all.
All we can do is hope that the money saved and earned will be used in the right channels by those who have the nice job of choosing where to spend the money.
BTW, no one has revealed what the margins, subsidies and revenues are for diesel. Is there room to upgrade to something with a less sulphur so we can enjoy cars like the Ford Focus TDCi and a potential upcoming diesel Honda City?
As of today, Malaysians have begun paying tax for their fuel again… in fact the government has not had to pay the promised RM0.30 per liter fuel subsidy since the beginning of November 2008 due to the dropping crude oil prices which leads to lower refinery prices.
According to Minister of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Datuk Shahrir Samad, the government also collected taxes for fuel from September 2001 to February 2002, but after that period crude oil had gone up so the government had stopped collecting taxes to prevent fuel prices from going up too much.
From the current price of RM2 per liter from RON97 petrol, roughly 12 sen goes to the petrol stations and roughly 19 sen goes to the oil companies. The balance is RM1.69, but Shahrir says this is actually higher than the refinery price.
While he did not say exactly how much refinery prices were at the moment (this will go up and down according to crude oil prices), he gave an example of RM1.30 per liter. This means the government can make as much as 39 sen per liter of fuel, and this amount will vary as the refinery prices go up and down along the month.
Because of the change of situation and the potential now for long-term income from the sale of fuel in this country, the government Economic Council will be meeting this month to decide on a new mechanism for petrol pricing in the country. Things that could be discussed are how often should price revisions be made, and what kind of tolerances towards crude oil prices should there be. I would imagine they could decide on something like a maximum tax when crude oil prices are low (or alternatively, a floor price for petrol), and a maximum subsidy when crude oil prices are high.
It’s sad to see the government so easily turn its back on its promise of a RM0.30 per liter subsidy, but Datuk Shahrir is of the opinion that the current low fuel prices are quite fair and there’s no need to go drop them too much even though the government won’t have to pay fuel subsidies per liter. He says this additional revenue will be used to strengthen the economy in face of the threat of the recession.
I’m pretty sure the Cabinet is happy with Shahrir’s performance as Minister of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs so far. He’s done his job well in helping tighten the government’s coffers, though many would argue it isn’t in the interest of “Consumer Affairs” at all.
All we can do is hope that the money saved and earned will be used in the right channels by those who have the nice job of choosing where to spend the money.
BTW, no one has revealed what the margins, subsidies and revenues are for diesel. Is there room to upgrade to something with a less sulphur so we can enjoy cars like the Ford Focus TDCi and a potential upcoming diesel Honda City?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Archive
-
▼
2018
(1860)
-
▼
August
(229)
- Spinning in Circles: Mazda’s Rotary Ambitions Stil...
- Hyundai Prepared to Juice Elantra GT Sales, Withou...
- Nissan’s New Juke Will Remain Uncompromisingly Weird
- 2018 Volvo S90 T8 ‘Twin Engine’ Inscription RHD/SW...
- Time Capsule: Nissan’s Frontier Returns for Anothe...
- Money Matters: Moody’s Downgrades Ford to Near Junk
- QOTD: I Am Become Death, Destroyer of Cars?
- 2019 Chevrolet Camaro Turbo 1LE First Drive – The ...
- Silent Running: Ford Sought Exception on Federal N...
- Elon Musk Just Might Get His Libel Suit Wish
- Thanks for the Customers: Chevrolet Will Continue ...
- Twenty Years of Cadillac Escalade, America’s Bling...
- Don’t Expect to See Many 2019 Chevy Cruzes With a CVT
- Job One: Ford Creates Special Group Tasked With De...
- Musk Man vs. Cave Man, Part Deux
- Mahindra to Fiat Chrysler: Nah, We’re Selling Our ...
- QOTD: Frequently Jumping to Car Conclusions?
- Ace of Base: 2019 Nissan Versa Sedan S
- Former Fiat Chrysler Official Gets 66 Months for R...
- 2019 GMC Sierra 1500s Land in the Build & Price Pl...
- Upgraded Nissan Versa Still Dirt Cheap, Gets Budge...
- What’s the Score? Cali GM Dealer Wins Against, erm...
- Toyota Investing $500 Million Into Uber for Driver...
- Rare Rides: The 1975 Jensen Interceptor Convertibl...
- Ask Jack: Bundled to Death?
- Tesla Buyers Reach Back Into the Public Purse Afte...
- QOTD: Luxury Car or Loaded Truck?
- Take Your Hands Off Our Heritage, Mustang Fans Tel...
- All Things Being Equal: The Changing Face of Luxury
- Tesla’s ‘Affordable’ Model 3 Costs a Bundle to Ins...
- Musk’s Tesla U-turn Prompted by Annoyed Saudis and...
- 2019 Chevrolet Malibu RS First Drive – Curiously V...
- NAFTA No More: U.S. Reaches Deal With Mexico, Puts...
- 2019 GMC Sierra Denali and AT4 First Drive – Beyon...
- Oh No! Maybe There’s Some Loyalty to Sedans After All
- QOTD: Help for Noobs?
- 2019 Hyundai Santa Fe First Drive – Remarkably Unr...
- Junkyard Find: 1983 Mercury Lynx L Wagon
- Rare Ferrari 250 GTO Becomes Most Expensive Used C...
- Going to the Dogs: Land Rover Launches New Range o...
- Behave: Jaguar Putting Electric E-Type Into Produc...
- Musk Pulls a Smoking 180, Leaves Go-private Plan i...
- Electrified in Monterey: Audi’s PB 18 e-tron Conce...
- Acura’s Shrinking Supercar Adds Goodies for 2019
- Apparently, Everyone Negotiating NAFTA Is a Child
- Infiniti Unveils New ‘Prototype’ Concept at Pebble...
- No Fixed Abode: No Home on the Ranger
- 2018 Chevrolet Camaro SS Hot Wheels Review – The P...
- You Can’t Have an EV for the Masses That Loses Money
- You Won’t Have to Buy One of Volkswagen’s Upcoming...
- Piston Slap: Tie Rod Tuning for a Tweaked Tiller?
- 2019 Ram 1500 eTorque First Drive – Fresh Horses
- It’s About Time: The Officially Official Reveal of...
- Leaked 2020 Mustang Shelby GT500 Specs Claim 720 H...
- In Vendita: FCA’s Magneti Marelli Could Be Sold, N...
- Red Star for Effort: Gunmaker-built Russian EV Ear...
- Rare Rides: A Rear-engined Volkswagen 412 Wagon Fr...
- Old Man’s Game: Car Dealerships Can’t Hold Onto Yo...
- America’s Minivan Market Still Hasn’t Reached the ...
- Someone’ll Pay: BMW Probably Won’t Stop at the 8 S...
- Feeling Average? Study Shows Owning a Car Is Still...
- QOTD: In the Mood for a Swap?
- BMW’s M2 Competition Ad Campaign Is Completely Rid...
- Ford Recalls Green Car Charging Cords Because Hous...
- 2019 Hyundai Elantra Refresh Actually Refreshing
- Line ’em Up: Volkswagen Preparing for Mass Firings
- Rare Rides: 2008 Edsel Citation – A Tribute via Vi...
- 2018 Cadillac ATS-V Review – From Golf Bags To Hel...
- The Perils of Second Place: Denali Is GMC’s Bigges...
- QOTD: The State of a Scarlet Letter?
- Ace of Base: 2018 Hyundai Elantra SE
- Same Old Song: Study Claims Uber and Lyft Increasi...
- Back in Time: GM Uzbekistan Increases Production o...
- Ford Ranger Raptor Debuts for Europe as North Amer...
- America’s Brief Infatuation With The Volkswagen Go...
- Public Becoming More Apprehensive About Robotic Ca...
- 2019 Honda Pilot First Drive — A Great Buy That Ma...
- Norway’s Wealth Fund Issues Savage Burn On Tesla
- Buy/Drive/Burn: American Malaise Sports Cars of 1982
- QOTD: Who Wins the Name Game?
- If Tesla’s Stock Was a Roller Coaster…
- Hooning Temporarily Shut Down the Bay Bridge Over ...
- Hyundai Says N Performance Kicking Ass in Europe, ...
- Fueling the Opposition: EPA Staff Had Serious Rese...
- 2018 GMC Acadia Denali AWD Review – Forbidden Love
- Welcome to the Six-figure Club, Lincoln!
- As Elon Musk Hunts Saudi Funding, Saudi Arabia Is ...
- QOTD: Advice From a Wise Old Sage?
- Junkyard Find: 1986 Subaru GL 4WD Wagon
- Good News For Tesla Fans: Model 3 Production Probl...
- Rear-end Collision Costs Toyota $242 Million
- Documents Show Volkswagen CEO Diess Knew About Ill...
- Audi’s U.S. Lineup Will Be Free of Manual Gearboxe...
- Adventures in Advertising: I Love What You Do for ...
- Ford Mustang Cobra Jet Makes Appearance for 50th B...
- Here’s Ford’s Plan to Replace All the Cars It’s Ki...
- Two Scoops of Brawn: 2019 Toyota Tundra TRD Pro Pa...
- Rare Rides: This 1975 Chevrolet Is Both Vega and C...
- 2018 Ford F-550 Super Duty Review – Put the Load R...
- Man on the Edge: New York Times Interview Shows El...
- QOTD: Fear Takes the Wheel?
- Piston Slap: The Geographic Luxury of Bespoke Moto...
- Suing for Incentives: Tesla Doesn’t Like the Way O...
- Push It: Volvo’s Got a Solution for Owners Wanting...
- Ford Keen on Ditching the Steering Wheel, Outlines...
- From the ‘Not Surprising’ Files: There’s Finally C...
- Your Future Steed? Brawny Chinese SUV Spied Testin...
- Germany Tells Owners of Cheating Volkswagen Diesel...
- Honda Odyssey Reigns Supreme in Latest Minivan Cra...
- 2019 Toyota Sienna: Bringing All-wheel Drive to Mo...
- Buy/Drive/Burn: Checking Out German Strippers From...
- QOTD: What’s the Best (or Worst) Looking License P...
- Hertz Offers Opportunity to Rent and Destroy 100th...
- Nearly Better Than the Real Thing: Porsche Taps Vi...
- SEC Gets Serious in Tesla Going-private Probe, Iss...
- Trade War Watch: Turkey Readies 120 Percent Tariff...
- Rare Rides: The 1978 Chrysler LeBaron Town & Count...
- Brawny, Four-cylinder, CVT-equipped Chevrolet Mali...
- No Longer the Dour German: Volkswagen Spektrum Pro...
- Because Subaru Can’t Turn Back Time, Some Owners S...
- QOTD: What Popular Vehicles Do You Loathe?
- Ace of Base: 2019 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD 4×2 D...
- Chevrolet Dumps 6.2-Liter V8 Into ‘Premier Plus’ E...
- Granite State: It Looks Like GMC’s Finally Pulling...
- Eternal Underdog: Mitsubishi May Not Sell Enough C...
- Spied: The 2020 Buick Encore You’ve Been Waiting For
- Faraday Future Sets up Headquarters in China, Prom...
- 2018 Hyundai Sonata SEL Review – Same Song, New Verse
-
▼
August
(229)
