Sanjeev answers: Do other TTAC writers have the same common/uncommon name mix up problem too? What say you, Jake Baruth, Stephan Lang and Derrick Kriendler? But, I know, I know…not everything is about me. So let's do this thang. After a bit of Googling, perhaps your dealer applied T-SB-0287-10:
But this link points to something more relevant, and interesting. Many (all?) electronically fuel injected vehicles cut fuel to the engine when "extended braking" in this manner. They've done it since the dawn of EEC-IV fuel injection on my super-precious Ford Fox bodies, that's for sure. But ye olde Foxes (5.0V8, 4-speed auto) don't bog very much at all as they slow down to idle. So what's the problem? When you slow down through 6 forward gears, the motor bogs down far more often than older vehicles with only 3 or 4 cogs to swap. When you combine this EFI program with the lack of low-end torque in modern engines (relative to the low revving engines from yesteryear) and the torque converter's stall speed (and the computer programming added to it) you have a recipe for a boggy, clumsy downshift. In these "extended braking" situations, that is. Simply(?) put, there are computer programs designed for maximum fuel efficiency, too many downshifting gears, computer controlled spinning fans (torque converter) and a relative lack of balls in rev-happy modern engines to ensure smooth downshifting. You're gonna have to live with it. Or change the way you brake. Or get a
Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars. from The Truth About Cars http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|
No comments:
Post a Comment