| With China being the world's largest car market, and the largest market of many of our carmakers, getting good and timely data is essential for stock analysts and journalists alike. Bloomberg has an exasperated story that cries about the absolute mess in China when it comes to hard data. It also describes the great lengths analysts go to when gauging Chinese car sales. No wonder the analyst reports are often messier than even the messiest Chinese data:
The article complains about the well-known fact that reliable data is very hard to come by in China. True. "Analysts and economists have complained that China's numbers are opaque and that the country's growth figures may be overstated." True. "With cars, one complaint is that unlike the U.S., Germany and Japan, China doesn't release figures on private car registrations." Not true. Germany and Japan release data based on true registrations (not just private) as compiled by the governments. Just like in China, U.S. sales data are based on reports from automakers. These reports are known to have their issues. (U.S. data compiled by the DMVs are available, but usually with a lot of delay, and nobody bothers.) Bloomberg goes on to suggest that China should release data based on official registration data. Good idea. For a while, the China Automotive Technology and Research Center (CATARC) released monthly data that allegedly were based on registration data compiled by the Public Security Bureaus (PSB) that are in charge of auto registrations in China. CATARC made headlines because their numbers were released a week in advance of the usually laggardly China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM). However, CATARC data were vastly different from the CAAM data. After months of confusion, CATARC was told to shut up and release no more. The odd thing is that Bloomberg was a big fan of CATARC, back in 2010. Forgot so fast?
from The Truth About Cars http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|
No comments:
Post a Comment