Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Motorist Faces $48,000 In Fines For Mounting Cellular Signal Jammer In Car

file_CO1676_Flexible_Smartphone_Docking

Network World is reporting that a Florida man who installed a cellular telephone jammer in the back seat of his Toyota Highlander is facing $48,000 in fines levied by the Federal Communications Commission. The FCC alleges that one Jason R Humphreys of Seffner, FL regularly used the device during his daily commute and that he originally installed it more than two years ago. When question about the reasoning, Mr. Humphreys told officials that he installed the jammer in order to prevent people in the cars around him from using their cell phones while driving – something that is, by the way, totally legal in the state of Florida with or without a hands-free device.

The case first came to light when T-Mobile USA's local carrier, a company called Mobile PCS, noticed problems with their towers over a 12 mile stretch of Interstate 4 between Seffner and Tampa. After noting that the interference seemed to coincide with the morning and evening commutes, Mobile PCS contacted the FCC who used direction finding equipment to identify the suspect's blue Toyota Highlander. When Sherriff's deputies approached the car, they noted that their own radios ceased to work and, after a search of the vehicle, found the jamming device hidden beneath a seat cover in the back seat.

Cellular jammers are illegal to own, manufacture or import into the United States and the FCC has taken a hardline stance against their use. Mr. Humphrey's fine technically covers two separate charges, one for use of an illegal device and another for causing intentional interference, and is being assessed for a single use of the device. Given the length of time he claims to have employed it, however, could have gone as high as $337,000. He has 30 days to either pay the fine or file a response.



from The Truth About Cars http://ift.tt/Jh8LjA

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

via Personal Recipe 680102

Google Shows Off How Its Autonomous Vehicles Aren’t Killing Cyclists or Hitting Parked Cars

Google autonomous car

Green means "go," right?

Well, that's a relief—Google has announced in a blog post that, after nearly 700,000 miles of real-world testing, its self-driving cars have gotten the hang of the urban jungle.

While it's reassuring that Google's autonomous cars are capable of digesting the often complex and chaotic scenes typical of a city street, we're a tiny bit curious over what things were like when the cars first hit the mean streets. Anyway, Google nonetheless claims it has had a trouble-free run of tens of thousands of test miles in and around its headquarters' Mountain View, California, environs.

As Google aptly points out, "a mile of city driving is more complex than a mile of freeway driving." While humans can take in a ton of information while behind the wheel and respond as if by second nature, autonomous vehicles must scan their environments and make (safe) decisions or predictions based on the information and data at hand, and that takes a ton of testing and programming.

Google autonomous car

Google cars' Terminator vision, made more appealing by bright colors.

So it's a big deal that Google's cars have been essentially "taught" to identify and navigate real-world obstacles such as bicyclists signaling, crossing guards holding stop signs, railroad crossings, parked cars, construction zones, and more is a big deal. (Bicyclists, children crossing streets, and construction workers in Mountain View previously unaware that they were part of a potentially disastrous experiment involving a technology undergoing active development, you may now breathe a sigh of relief.) Curiously, in spite of the cars' work-in-progress status, Google claims its cars are poised to be the safest vehicles on the road.



As the company puts it, "A self-driving vehicle can pay attention to all of these things in a way that a human physically can't—and it never gets tired or distracted." We are of the mind that a monkey or a six-year-old without a smartphone in hand is a safer driver than distracted or fatigued drivers, but we're also not so sure Google's cars are the zero-sum answer to distracted driving. There will always be some kind of scenario that falls just outside an autonomous car's programming, not to mention the nebulous concept of "judgment" that we're not sure a circuit board can ever learn. We'll still drive ourselves, thank you, although that isn't to say Google's tech isn't impressive. You can see how the cars take in and understand data in this neat video:



from Car and Driver Blog http://ift.tt/nSHy27

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

via Personal Recipe 647533

Mercedes-Benz Prices 2014 B-Class Electric Drive

2014MercedesBenzCClassElectricDrive

The 2014 B-Class Electric Drive, Mercedes-Benz's new four-door electric vehicle hatchback, will arrive at dealerships in July with a price tag of $42,375, including a $925 destination charge. The B-Class Electric Drive could be eligible for federal tax credits of as much as $7,500, in addition to state and local credits. The luxury EV initially will be available only in 10 states, including California, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island and Vermont, with nationwide expansion expected to be announced next year. The EV version is the only variant of the B-Class available in the U.S.; gas and diesel models are sold internationally.

2014 Mercedes-Benz B-Class Electric Drive: Up Close

The automaker says the electric motor, powered by a lithium-ion battery pack, is equivalent in power to a three-cylinder gas engine making 177 horsepower and 251 pounds-feet of torque. Mercedes-Benz estimates a zero-to-60 mph time of 7.9 seconds and a top speed of 100 mph. The automaker also said charge time for 60 miles of range should take less than two hours on a 240-volt outlet; the vehicle's maximum range is estimated at 85 miles. When the B-Class originally was announced, its range was expected to be 115 miles; that figure is 30 miles more than the estimated range now being reported.

Standard equipment on the five-seat, front-wheel-drive B-Class Electric Drive includes navigation, a collision prevention system with adaptive braking, Attention Assist, 17-inch alloy wheels, an eight-year 100,000-mile battery warranty, no-cost annual maintenance and roadside assistance. In addition, the Vehicle Homepage system allows owners to access the vehicle remotely via computer or smartphone to monitor info such as the charging progress, the vehicle's map position and recharging stations along a planned route, in addition to pre-entry climate control.

The B-Class Electric Drive, which we first saw at the 2013 New York International Auto Show, has exterior and interior dimensions roughly the same as Ford's C-Max Hybrid and C-Max Energi plug-in hybrid, but is much more expensive. The Energi starts at $33,745, including destination.

Cars.com photo by Evan Sears



from KickingTires http://ift.tt/1hiG57n

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

via Personal Recipe 647517

Toyota to Move U.S. Sales and Marketing Operations to Plano, Texas

Toyota logo on dealership exterior

It seems there's no part of American heartland Toyota can't win over. After entering NASCAR in 2004 as the sport's first-ever factory-backed effort from an import brand—and establishing itself in the South and Midwest with six assembly plants starting in 1983—the Japanese stalwart is now moving its U.S. corporate headquarters to Texas. (Does this explain the recent rumors of a Lexus TX crossover?)

By early 2017, about 4000 employees will relocate to Plano, less than 20 miles north of Dallas, to a brand-new facility that will consolidate Toyota's three separate operations under one roof. The move will close Toyota's manufacturing HQ in Erlanger, Kentucky; its sales HQ in Torrance, California; and a corporate office in New York City. Toyota's San Antonio plant, which opened in 2006 to build the Tundra and Tacoma pickups, lies about 300 miles to the south and employs 2900 people.

A few employees will move this year into a temporary facility before ground is broken on the new building in the fall. Toyota's regional offices for PR, finance, and Lexus are not moving. Its California design studio, Michigan technical center, and Toyota Racing Development office are staying put, too. Most employees will be offered a relocation incentive, but as with any major corporate move, not all will choose to make the journey.



Texas, which doesn't have corporate or individual income taxes, has been aggressive in courting outside businesses under Governor Rick Perry. Toyota received a $40 million grant from the state and is expected to spend at least $300 million on the new headquarters, while the automaker will no doubt save some serious cash over the long haul (which means cheaper Camrys for everyone, right?). Tesla is also eying the Lone Star state as a site for its upcoming $4 billion battery plant.



from Car and Driver Blog http://ift.tt/nSHy27

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

via Personal Recipe 647533

Chart Of The Day: Europe’s C-Segment, Now With More Premium Options

csegmentpremium

 

Yesterday's chart didn't include premium C-segment entrants, but commenter Vega beat me to the punch in mentioning them.

The Audi A3, BMW 1-Series and Mercedes-Benz A-Class have been giving the mainstream marques major headaches in Europe for the same reason that mainstream makes with mid-size sedans are worried about the Mercedes-Benz CLA. Why would you have a Camry or an Accord when you could have the three-pointed star (at least that's the rationale in some people's minds)? Looking at the stats, the A3 and 1-Series would slot in at 4th and 5th place in yesterday's JATO rankings, while the A-Class would bump the Auris down a notch.

This effect is more pronounced in Europe, where mainstream brands have taken a beating. The only car makers that have flourished have been high end luxury brands (for obvious reasons) or low-cost brands that are appealing to value-conscious middle class consumers, and consequently stealing sales from mainstream brands. This is also why Renault is doing well (thanks to Dacia) while PSA, with only Peugeot and Citroen, is taking such a beating.

With a 1-Series or A-Class starting at around the same price as a fancy Golf, Megane or Focus, the consumer feels the same pull away from the mainstream, and into something more impressive. Unless you're Volkswagen- then you're just leveraging the efficiencies of MQB and laughing all the way to the bank, as both the A3 and Golf enjoy strong sales.



from The Truth About Cars http://ift.tt/Jh8LjA

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

via Personal Recipe 680102

TTAC Long-Term Tesla Part 1: Why I Bought A Tesla Model S

img-0174
Ed Zitron is a friend of TTAC, but not much of a car guy. After giving up his old, gasoline powered car, Ed went and bought a Tesla Model S P85 – and we asked him to write about it over a period of 12 months, documenting his ownership experience and what it's like to live with an electric car. This is the first installment.
I do not know much about cars. I got my license two years ago, after growing up in London, moving to Aberystwyth (Wales), moving to New York, and only then moving to New Jersey, where having a car is somehow more natural than having legs. I unhappily learned to drive, and just about got through my test on the first go, even though my parallel parking was – to quote the instructor – "bad."
I also know very little about cars – you go fast with right pedal, you stop with left pedal. Don't stand in front of another car that is moving, especially if it's moving fast. Porsches are nice, so are Ferraris. GM stands for General Motors. More importantly, petrol (or as Americans call it "gas") goes inside. It starts an explosion (I think?) and the car moves. When you are running low on gas, you go to a "gas station", where you stick a thing in your car and it smells a lot, but then you can get on your way again.
I started my driving years with a Volvo S60. It was reliable, unsexy and introduced me to the concept of driving well enough. I then moved to San Francisco, minus the Volvo, and realised that taking the Caltrain to Mountain View every day was going to become rather tiresome, and that it was time to buy a car.  So, I decided I wanted a Tesla Model S.
I wrote about games and gadgets for about seven years before moving to America and into the awful world of Public Relations, and I've always wanted the latest gadgets. To me, the Tesla is just an extension of this compulsion.
Waiting for my Tesla to arrive, I've been in Getaround and Zipcar rentals for most of my week. I've been in low-end and high-end Mercedes, BMWs (including their electric DriveNow rentals), Audis, a smart ForTwo and a Chevy Volt. Probably around fifteen different cars, all from good to great manufacturers. I even rented a 2013 Tesla Model S. I've seen a fair sample – though by no means an exhaustive one – of what the car industry has offered for the last two years. Yes, they all have wheels and drive in a straight line, and got me to the places I was going without catching fire, but the actual experience, compared to the Tesla, was inferior and anachronistic.
It's not the actual driving that's the problem – cars are, well, cars. Especially to a car-knowledge-defunct person like myself. However I'd consider myself the general purpose sample of most people – I'm guessing most do not know much more than I do. The problem is that most of these cars have navigation, bluetooth control of your phone's music (and sound systems), and general car settings. You also have to control air conditioning, cruise control, and other car functions *while driving*.
This is what in tech they'd call the User Interface. And the 'user interface' of most cars sucks, because before the Model S there has been no solid proof that you can do it better. The comparison is easy to make – this is what happened to cellphones. Before the iPhone, your average cellphone was an awkward chocolate-bar shaped thing that you texted on by hitting in numbers. The iPhone arrived, and the industry collectively shat its pants – touchscreens were, before this point, a quasi-joke that only Microsoft would back. Ironic, right?
Similarly, though not to the same extent, many carriers didn't want the iPhone around, and claimed it was too expensive, that there was no market for it, and so on. Carriers didn't like supporting it at first. Millions of people wanted it. Then Android happened. Overnight it was apparent that a lot of people didn't like buttons.
Tesla's growth is not going to be so rapid: this is a car, one that's anywhere from $60,000 to $120,000, and you can't just walk up and buy one in the traditional manner.
When it comes to the purchasing process, it seems like Tesla treats the customer with a degree of kindness and thoughtfulness that is missing from the motor industry. Perhaps I have not spent enough time driving cars to understand why people accept this – perhaps there's a low-grade tinnitus that stops you from noticing that your car – even your just-bought car – in comparison to every other interactive medium is about a decade behind.
Even though it's unfair to compare a Model S to a Prius, or an S60, or a Cruze or anything really below a nice Audi or BMW, the average guy like me is seeing very clearly that you can build an interaction with a car that's as pleasant as your phone. It means that they have to start putting more energy into R&D, and means that simply adding a screen or tweaking a touchscreen each year is not going to work.
It's an attitude built on a fat, old industry with great swathes of red tape and corporate groupthink. Cars are meant to be like THIS because our FOCUS GROUP says so. Decisions are made from the perspective of an executive (who would never drive said mass market car in a million years good lord no), thinking that they are in touch with the typical consumer. Branding experts win the battle against engineering and usability, and car commercials have become little more than televised SEO (look at all the meaningless statistics and figures they throw at you – even gearheads know that a lot of it, like horsepower-per-liter, is BS) and Deepak Chopra-rejected platitudes –  they are a black hole for information with a pricetag at the end, because they are anxious at having to admit that, in their eyes their product is just another car.
The Tesla upends this because it provides differentiated product. Yes, it goes fast and all that, but the interface is different, the car is different, it looks different, it feels different, you save money on gas, they have service techs that will drive to you, you have a network of superchargers, and so on. It's no longer a case of "THIS YEAR…THE CAR THAT YOU DRIVE COULD BE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT FROM THE OTHER." This is a new kind of car.
That's scary. How do you compete with that? Apart from making a product as good as it, or better. But that costs money and effort, and doing so admits that Tesla might be doing something right. Which will piss off your dealers, and regulators, and gas fans, and…shit. Isn't adding an updated version of MyEnTouchLink just so much easier?
This isn't to say that the Model S is perfect, or that the supercharger network doesn't have problems, or that the beautiful electric car future is here Let's face it – it's very, very far away, and only the most deluded fanboys would think otherwise. But I'm not a fanboy. I'm just a regular guy who decided to roll the dice on a new kind of car. And I'm very happy. Let's see if I stay that way over the next 12 months.
Next-up: what it's like to buy direct from a factory store, using the Supercharger and getting used to driving an EV


from The Truth About Cars http://ift.tt/Jh8LjA

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

via Personal Recipe 680102

Hammer Time: Trading Cards, Tradin’ Cars

kids-collecting-cards

Rookies. All-stars. Hall of Famers.

Those were the only three types of baseball cards that I thought were worth the trade when I was a kid. I was eight years old, but that didn't stop me from becoming diligently schooled by my three older brothers who knew the ropes of other similar hobbies such as comics, coins, and stamps.

The drill was simple. Every time someone wanted to trade cards with me, I would ask them one simple question.

"What's your favorite team?" From there, I would bring out an album loaded with baseball cards. Every one in mint condition and encased in plastic sheets. "Pick your favorites!" They would gather their own, and I would go through their collection, find the fresher cards in mint condition, and gather mine.

Over 30 years later I do the exact same thing with cars. I sell based on interest and buy based on condition and long-term reliability. I'm still not loyal to any brand or model these days. For me, even after all these years, the opportunity to buy and sell any car comes down to three simple concepts I learned in my youth.

Condition, presentation, and price.

Every car has its price, and it's the condition and presentation that determine the value.

Unpopular vehicles may be the cheapskate's dream. But they're a seller's nightmare.

Three door minivans? Buy them low, sell them quick, and avoid them like a painful venereal disease. A cheap car with low demand always takes up space for too long. Base model non-sporty wagons from the Y2K era with 5-speeds? Same deal.

Low demand, low performance cars net low returns. Even if you are a stingy bastard. In baseball card terms, they are the common players that nobody wants. The Chicken Stanleys who are used as cardboard fodder for the Jeff Bagwells.

Camrys and Accords? You have to pay a premium for the good ones and unless you finance, you better get one without major accidents. What sells for cash at this "all-star" level is the mint condition version.

You can get away with selling a popular car with a rough history to those with bad credit. Whenever I see a person who is struggling with a fancy car, I think about the traders who could never keep their good cards for long. There was always something a bit more new and popular that would catch their eye, and it was my job to figure out what it would be.

Baseball cards and cars pretty much sell the same way. 

1) Always offer a history.

Folks are always purchasing three things when they buy a used car. The model they want. The prior owner they prefer, and the maintenance history they desire. Even if you offer a piece of miscellaneous nothing such as, "I bought it two years ago from an older guy who lives in Pawtucket.", the potential buyer will usually appreciate the fact that there is one less uncertainty in the history of your vehicle.

2) Sell yourself.

If you come across as an honest guy and an expert (or at least knowledgeable), you'll have a big leg up on the 90+% who are either too scared or too corrupt to do the same.

3) Don't be afraid to say a car has an accident. Everything has defects. 

In fact, telling folks specifically what happened can be a great way to affirm #1 and #2. A VW Beetle TDI I recently sold had an accident on the driver's side that required a repaint on the door and a replaced front quarter panel. By showing what was done, emailing the Carfax history beforehand, and specifying who did the repair, I was able to show the buyers that I had nothing to hide.

That candidness alone often gives you a price premium over those sellers who just glaze through everything. When I sold cards, I would mention the small defects and often times, it made the other guy feel like he wasn't getting screwed.

4) Clean the damn thing! Please!

You ever go to a junkyard and see all the wonderful souvenirs that are left behind by the last owner? Well, the junkyard doesn't have to worry about those endearing mementos.

But you must certainly do.

The next owner probably doesn't want that Hello Kitty CD holder on the sun visor. All those crumply things in the glovebox? Remove them and reorganize what you have so that you can give them a maintenance history that they can physically hold. I would get the car washed, vacuumed, and invest in a basic spray on or quick wax along with an hour or so of time removing stains and marks.

A mint condition baseball card was always a better buy in the eyes of my customers when I was a kid, and a clean car is no different.

5) If the car doesn't sell immediately, study the market.

Edmunds, Kelly Blue Book, NADA, and even dealer-focused price guides such as Black Book and the Manheim Market Report all have one thing in common.

They are rough approximations based on imperfect data… and much of the time, those imperfections are due to a seller's inflated idea of their vehicle's condition.

Everybody falls victim to this at one time or another. Even dealers. Even yours truly. Most sellers tend to price their vehicles in clean condition even though their vehicles are somewhere between average and God awful. If you see no action out there, forget about the price guides. Look at how the competition is pricing the same type of vehicle. The marketplace always tells you things that the price guides miss.

6) Pictures, pictures, and more pictures.

Take pictures of everything before you advertise…. and take multiples. I have often found that early mornings offer the best time when shadows and sun reflections have the least impact on my pictures. Overcast days are also great for this purpose. So make sure to take pictures of everything; especially those close-up areas that aren't perfect.

If a seller is already comfortable with the price, showing them the cosmetic issues now will eliminate the desire for a lower price when they see those defects in person.

7) Organize The Sale: Bill of Sale, Money, Title, Plate and Keys

A lot of folks have trouble selling cars because it's an organization game. You have to bring everything together and understand the sequence of events so that the flow of the deal is always in motion. Shake hands. Answer questions. Give them physical records of the car's history. Let them have time with the car. Be patient. Leave them alone. Give them space.

When you are organized, you can afford to be laid back and observant. People like that because it means you're paying attention to them and putting their needs first. When I was trading baseball cards, the eye candy alone was enough to keep me and the other person occupied. With cars there are more steps, but the same human elements of the transaction applies.

When you're organized, in anything, it's easier for both parties to enjoy the experience. It also keeps you honest because you don't have to figure things out on the fly.

Am I wrong? Is the four-square method of customer manipulation more effective than being a mensch, putting your best foot forward, and keeping organized?

Let me know…



from The Truth About Cars http://ift.tt/Jh8LjA

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

via Personal Recipe 680102

Archive